Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of Intensive Community Care Services and Psychosocial Interventions for Adolescents With Severe Mental Health Problems
- Forfatter(e)
- Syed, S., Pascual-Sanchez, A., Adesiyan, P., Rabot, K., Sanson, L., Eaton, R., Ougrin, D.
- År
- 2026
- Tidsskrift
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Volum
- 22
- Sider
- 22
- Kategori(er)
- Angst og engstelighet (inkl. både vansker og lidelse) Atferdsproblemer, antisosial atferd og atferdsforstyrrelser Depresjon og nedstemthet (inkl. både vansker og lidelse) Selvskading/selvmord
- Tiltakstype(r)
- FamilieterapiForeldreveiledning/-terapiKognitiv atferdsterapi, atferdsterapi og kognitiv terapiPsykoedukative tiltak (inkl. videobasert modellæring)
- Abstract
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of intensive community care and services (ICCS) compared with treatment as usual (TAU), including inpatient care, and to synthesize common psychosocial interventions used within ICCS.
METHOD
We searched 14 databases from January 1, 1999, to May 30, 2025, for quantitative studies of ICCS for adolescents predominantly (aged 12-18 years) with mental health problems. We used a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICCS vs TAU (and inpatient care only) on psychosocial functioning, mental health, and cost-effectiveness outcomes. We used a narrative synthesis with an adapted Delphi approach to identify common psychosocial interventions and theoretical mechanisms. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO.
RESULTS
We included 48 publications on 38 unique ICCS samples (N = 16,546 adolescents; median age, 14.5 years) involving admission avoidance/home treatment, assertive outreach, and family preservation models. Meta-analysis of 11 unique RCTs (range, 297-1,294 participants per outcome) showed that, compared with TAU, ICCS yielded statistically significant improvements in psychosocial functioning (Hedges g = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.04, 0.26; 9 RCTs), reductions in inpatient admission days (-0.48 -0.82, -0.15; 4 RCTs), total emotional and behavioral problems (-0.15, -0.30, -0.01; 5 RCTs), and externalizing symptoms (-0.18, -0.30, -0.06; 6 RCTs) post treatment. The effect for psychosocial functioning increased and remained significant when comparing ICCS with inpatient care only (0.25, 0.04, 0.46; 5 RCTs). No significant differences were found for internalizing symptoms, family functioning, or total costs. The narrative synthesis showed that psychosocial interventions consistently included enhanced engagement strategies, cognitive- behavioral therapy, family systems approaches, and dialectical behavior therapy skills.
CONCLUSION
For adolescents with severe mental health problems, ICCS yielded small but significant improvements in psychosocial functioning, and reductions in inpatient days and emotional and behavioral symptoms, while achieving comparable effects for other outcomes. Findings support the expansion of ICCS as a viable alternative to inpatient care. Future research should prioritize multisite RCTs and developing and evaluating standardized psychosocial intervention guidelines to enhance treatment fidelity and outcomes.
STUDY REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Psychosocial interventions for young people with acute and complex mental health problems requiring intensive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024574885.