Benefits and harms of ADHD interventions: umbrella review and platform for shared decision making
- Forfatter(e)
- Gosling, C. J., Garcia-Argibay, M., De Prisco, M., Arrondo, G., Ayrolles, A., Antoun, S., Caparos, S., Catalan, A., Ellul, P., Dobrosavljevic, M., Farhat, L. C., Fico, G., Eudave, L., Groenman, A. P., Hojlund, M., Jurek, L., Nourredine, M., Oliva, V., Parlatini, V., Psyllou, C., Salazar-de-Pablo, G., Tomlinson, A., Westwood, S. J., Cipriani, A., Correll, C. U., Yon, D. K., Larsson, H., Ostinelli, E. G., Shin, J. I., Fusar-Poli, P., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Radua, J., Solmi, M., Delorme, R., Cortese, S.
- År
- 2025
- Tidsskrift
- BMJ
- Volum
- 391
- Sider
- e085875
- Kategori(er)
- ADHD
- Tiltakstype(r)
- Kognitiv atferdsterapi, atferdsterapi og kognitiv terapiAntidepressivaSentralstimulerende medikamenter
- Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of and related evidence certainty of interventions for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) across an individual's lifespan, and to develop a continuously updated web platform for people with lived experience of ADHD as a method to disseminate living evidence synthesis for shared decision making.
DESIGN
Umbrella review and platform for shared decision making.
DATA SOURCES
Six databases from inception to 19 January 2025. Study authors were contacted for additional information when necessary.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Systematic reviews that used meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials were eligible if they compared a drug or non-drug intervention with a passive control in individuals with a diagnosis of ADHD. Primary outcomes were severity of ADHD symptoms, analysed by rater type (clinician-rated, parent-rated, teacher-rated, or self-rated) and time point (short term (12 weeks, or study endpoint), medium term (26 weeks), and long term (52 weeks)),acceptability (participants dropping out for any reason), and tolerability (participants dropping out owing to any side effects). Secondary outcomes included daily functioning, quality of life, comorbid symptoms, and key side effects (decreased sleep and appetite).
DATA SYNTHESIS
Eligible meta-analyses were re-estimated with a standardised statistical approach. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Evidence certainty was evaluated using an algorithmic version of the GRADE framework, adapted for drug and non-drug interventions.
RESULTS
115 of 414 full text articles were deemed eligible and 299 were excluded; the eligible articles comprised 221 unique combinations of participants, interventions, comparators, and outcomes. For each combination, the most recent and methodologically robust meta-analysis was selected for re-estimation, which gave 221 re-estimated meta-analyses in total, derived from 47 meta-analytic reports. In the short term, alpha-2 agonists, amphetamines, atomoxetine, methylphenidate, and viloxazine showed medium to large effect sizes in reducing the severity of ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents, with moderate to high certainty evidence. Methylphenidate showed consistent benefits across raters (standardised mean difference >0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.03; moderate or high certainty evidence). These interventions showed lower tolerability than the placebo, but this effect was not significant for methylphenidate and atomoxetine. In adults, atomoxetine, cognitive behavioural therapy, methylphenidate (and, when restricting analyses to high quality trials, amphetamines) showed at least moderate certainty evidence of efficacy on ADHD symptoms, with medium effect sizes. Methylphenidate, amphetamines, and atomoxetine had worse tolerability than placebo (methylphenidate, risk ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.69; amphetamines, 0.40, 0.22 to 0.72; atomoxetine, 0.45, 0.35 to 0.58). Some non-drug interventions (acupuncture and cognitive behavioural therapy in children and adolescents, and mindfulness in adults) showed large effect sizes for ADHD symptoms, but with low certainty evidence. No high certainty, long term evidence was found for any intervention. An online platform showing effects and evidence certainty of each intervention across age groups, time points, and outcomes (https://ebiadhd-database.org/) was developed.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides updated evidence to inform patients, practitioners, and guideline developers how best to manage ADHD symptoms. The online platform should facilitate the implementation of shared decision making in daily practice.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Open Science Framework https://osf.io/ugqy6/.