Hopp til hovedinnhold
Logo som leder til forsiden

Efficacy of interventions to prevent eating disorders in people with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review

Forfatter(e)
D'Silva, N., Sandoval, N. S., Gillespie, K. M., Wisting, L., Hendrieckx, C., Stice, E., Jones, L., Gannon, S. N., Ward, W., White, M., Bartlett, S. E.
År
2026
DOI
10.1186/s40337-025-01460-2
Tidsskrift
Journal of Eating Disorders
Volum
14
Sider
16
Kategori(er)
Depresjon og nedstemthet (inkl. både vansker og lidelse) Spiseforstyrrelser Somatisk sykdom (inkl. smertetilstander)
Tiltakstype(r)
Kognitiv atferdsterapi, atferdsterapi og kognitiv terapiPsykoedukative tiltak (inkl. videobasert modellæring)
Abstract

Background

Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at increased risk of developing disordered eating (DE) and eating disorders (ED). Diabetes self-management focuses on food and insulin administration, which may contribute to development of EDs. The dual diagnosis may contribute to suboptimal glycemia, early diabetes-related complications and mortality. Evidence for ED prevention programs for this high-risk population remains limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of available interventions to prevent EDs and improve glycemia in people with T1D.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science was conducted on 25 January 2025. Studies using randomized controlled, quasi-experimental or cohort design that targeted ED prevention in T1D population were included.

Results

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, featuring interventions such as cognitive dissonance based programs, psychoeducation and self-compassion programs. Cognitive dissonance based programs demonstrated the most consistent reduction in ED risks and symptoms. However, most studies showed negligible improvement in glycemia. Common limitations were small sample sizes, high drop-out rates and short follow-ups.

Conclusion

Future research should focus on well-powered RCTs to evaluate interventions over longer timeframes, younger age groups, both genders, carer involvement and additional modifications to improve glycemia concurrently.