Dialectical Behavior Therapy Programming for Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Implementation Outcomes
- Forfatter(e)
- Boustani, M., Mazzone, E., Hodgins, J., Rith-Najarian, L.
- År
- 2024
- Tidsskrift
- Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
- Sider
- 16
- Kategori(er)
- Atferdsproblemer, antisosial atferd og atferdsforstyrrelser Depresjon og nedstemthet (inkl. både vansker og lidelse) Bipolare lidelser Selvskading/selvmord Angst og engstelighet (inkl. både vansker og lidelse) Tvangsforstyrrelser (OCD) Traumatiske belastninger/stress (PTSD) ADHDSpiseforstyrrelser Psykose
- Tiltakstype(r)
- Kognitiv atferdsterapi, atferdsterapi og kognitiv terapiSkole/barnehagebaserte tiltak
- Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an updated examination of the adolescent Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) literature and synthesize study findings across treatment settings (e.g. inpatient, outpatient, school), and treatment levels (e.g. clinical intervention, targeted, universal prevention). We also provide meta-analytic findings of the impact of DBT across key problem behaviors: depression, emotion dysregulation, suicidal and self-harm behaviors, externalizing problems, and eating disorders.
Method
A reference database search was used to identify studies conducted on adolescent DBT interventions from 2000 through 2023 (N = 72). In addition to ensuring that the review process conformed to the PRISMA statement, we independently verified that each study met inclusion criteria before triple coding each article to examine variables of interest and extracted outcome data needed to conduct meta-analyses.
Results
DBT appears to demonstrate effectiveness in improving mental health outcomes in adolescents across a range of psychiatric problems. To meet these treatment needs, DBT interventions have been appropriately adapted based on care setting, suggesting empirical support in inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient programs, as well as in outpatient settings, juvenile correctional facilities, and schools.
Conclusions
The growing evidence base for adolescent DBT appears to reflect its promise and versatile clinical utility. Clinical implications and recommendations for future directions are discussed, including the need for more randomized controls and representation of diverse communities.